Friday, February 27, 2009
Such Powerful Words
A veteran was talking on the radio today about how he would love to own a farm, and how he felt that using a shovel to farm is as empowering as using a weapon at war. He also said that he would like to return to Iraq one day, but rather as a farmer and not as a soldier. I was really touched!
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Conversation Anyone?
Ten years ago, my friends and I used to go to the local coffee shop for a good conversation. These conversations frequently spread to include strangers too. Rules were unspoken, really, but everyone seemed to know that they were always welcome to join in our conversation. It was a friendly place to be. Of course, we may never see them again. Hmmm, wait a minute! Is this starting to look like an intellectual one-night-stand? I guess it is. Is that so bad?
I must admit that I am missing this sort of instant conversation. You'd think that they are not too hard to come across, right? Starbucks and other coffee shops are on every corner and almost always full. But it is different. These conversations are getting harder and harder. Why?
My first blame goes to computers and cell phones. Everyone is at the coffee shop with their computers/cellphones looking busy and unapproachable. I can never tell if they are laughing about a joke that we are making or an email they just received.
Then, people usually go to a coffee shop either alone or as a couple. That's a problem! Think about it, if you are alone at a coffee shop, chances are you are not going to start a conversation by yourself, you are not likely to interrupt others' conversation - although some do, and I admire them for that. A couple is even worse. A couple at a coffee shop is inert and self sufficient. Most of the times, it feels like an intrusion to ask them for an extra seat at their table, let alone strike a conversation with them.
Finally, the environment at coffee shops has changed. Naturally, coffee shops are in it for the profit, and so they need the speedy turnaround. If you walk into a coffee shop, you will not find those cosy leather couches and arm chair surrounding a "coffee table" anymore. You will find tables for two, maybe a cosy chair or two by the fireplace, and maybe a table for four. Even if you try to join several tables together to seat a number of friends, you will end up blocking passages and creating a mess.
So, no coffee shops, got it! But if I am yearning for one of my good old intellectual one-night-stands, where should I go?
I must admit that I am missing this sort of instant conversation. You'd think that they are not too hard to come across, right? Starbucks and other coffee shops are on every corner and almost always full. But it is different. These conversations are getting harder and harder. Why?
My first blame goes to computers and cell phones. Everyone is at the coffee shop with their computers/cellphones looking busy and unapproachable. I can never tell if they are laughing about a joke that we are making or an email they just received.
Then, people usually go to a coffee shop either alone or as a couple. That's a problem! Think about it, if you are alone at a coffee shop, chances are you are not going to start a conversation by yourself, you are not likely to interrupt others' conversation - although some do, and I admire them for that. A couple is even worse. A couple at a coffee shop is inert and self sufficient. Most of the times, it feels like an intrusion to ask them for an extra seat at their table, let alone strike a conversation with them.
Finally, the environment at coffee shops has changed. Naturally, coffee shops are in it for the profit, and so they need the speedy turnaround. If you walk into a coffee shop, you will not find those cosy leather couches and arm chair surrounding a "coffee table" anymore. You will find tables for two, maybe a cosy chair or two by the fireplace, and maybe a table for four. Even if you try to join several tables together to seat a number of friends, you will end up blocking passages and creating a mess.
So, no coffee shops, got it! But if I am yearning for one of my good old intellectual one-night-stands, where should I go?
Monday, February 23, 2009
Chronicles of The Bitchin' Trio: Ah, The Good Old Dating Days
At the gym, there is a group of girlfriends who work out together and bitch their brains out about their dates and about men in general. I have seen them a number of times already, but this looks like it is going to be an ongoing thing, and so I am all prepared to help mankind learn from their experience.
Day 1: "men like bitches" You can't treat men nicely. So let's say your boyfriend calls you, don't answer. Send a txt message or two but don't spoil him by giving him the illusion that you are eager to talk. Also, boyfriend taking two jobs is a no no no. He can take the second job, but he won't see her anymore.
Day 2: Men don't listen should be given only two chances to act on a woman's requests. If she needs to ask a third time, then there is no point in sticking around. "A man not listening that early in a relationship is not a good sign".
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Movie Review: Where On Earth is Osama Bin Laden?
Not at all what I expected, but interesting movie.
I expected more of the Michael Moore style, I suppose. A lot of facts, shutting doors, exposing those at the top...etc. Which would have been interesting, but this one was different.
It was about someone who is about to become a father. He starts worrying about how to best protect his unborn child. One of his biggest worries is terrorism, and so he decides to end that by finally finding Bin Laden.
He travels through out the middle east and on to Afghanistan, Pakistan. In each country, he stops and asks average people on the street where they think Bin Laden is, and how they see the United States.
At the end of his trip, which was full of adventure, he realizes that since terrorism is everywhere, and no country is really safe from it, then even if he catches Bin Laden, it wouldn't make any difference.
A very mellow approach compared to what I was expecting.
It is funny that he starts his trip in Egypt. Egypt's friendliness didn't fail him. He interviews people, he is invited to their houses, met with a smile and open arms. They even mentioned on several occasions that they love the Americans, but it is rather the American policy that they resist.
Of course, Egypt is not exempt from terrorist attacks. A bomb went off in the middle of Cairo today. While extremely sad, it is still very mild when compared to what the rest of the region is seeing.
Throughout his trip, most countries met him with equal friendliness. The exceptions were: Israel, where no one wanted to talk to him except the police, and one lady; Saudi Arabia, where people were terrified of him (or perhaps their destiny if they were to talk); and Afghanistan where people were happy to talk to him, but the conversation was interrupted because extremists started attacking.
The reaction of Israelis and Saudis was particularly shocking to me. I would have guessed that they would be the first to opt in and extend their hospitality. Of course, I don't know what he said to them in the first place to generate this strong reaction. Perhaps I need to learn more about this region.
Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnBt2nH_FF8
I expected more of the Michael Moore style, I suppose. A lot of facts, shutting doors, exposing those at the top...etc. Which would have been interesting, but this one was different.
It was about someone who is about to become a father. He starts worrying about how to best protect his unborn child. One of his biggest worries is terrorism, and so he decides to end that by finally finding Bin Laden.
He travels through out the middle east and on to Afghanistan, Pakistan. In each country, he stops and asks average people on the street where they think Bin Laden is, and how they see the United States.
At the end of his trip, which was full of adventure, he realizes that since terrorism is everywhere, and no country is really safe from it, then even if he catches Bin Laden, it wouldn't make any difference.
A very mellow approach compared to what I was expecting.
It is funny that he starts his trip in Egypt. Egypt's friendliness didn't fail him. He interviews people, he is invited to their houses, met with a smile and open arms. They even mentioned on several occasions that they love the Americans, but it is rather the American policy that they resist.
Of course, Egypt is not exempt from terrorist attacks. A bomb went off in the middle of Cairo today. While extremely sad, it is still very mild when compared to what the rest of the region is seeing.
Throughout his trip, most countries met him with equal friendliness. The exceptions were: Israel, where no one wanted to talk to him except the police, and one lady; Saudi Arabia, where people were terrified of him (or perhaps their destiny if they were to talk); and Afghanistan where people were happy to talk to him, but the conversation was interrupted because extremists started attacking.
The reaction of Israelis and Saudis was particularly shocking to me. I would have guessed that they would be the first to opt in and extend their hospitality. Of course, I don't know what he said to them in the first place to generate this strong reaction. Perhaps I need to learn more about this region.
Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnBt2nH_FF8
I Hate Bombs!
What is the purpose of mass destruction anywyas?
It kills innocent people, why?
It destroys beautiful history and architecture, why?
It ruins memories, why?
WHY?
What a shame.
Those who created them should be ashamed. But those who trade them and those who use them should be....I don't even know what to say. Much as I would want to bomb them, I figure it would be a very cheap way to do it. They may even take pride in being bombed.
I suppose that if it were up to me, I would first have them rebuild what they have ruined of schools, houses, monuments, streets, hospitals...etc by their own hands and with their own money. Then, I would have the families of those killed by their bombs decide their destiny hoping that they wouldn't be too merciful.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Drugs? Are You Joking?
So the price of cocaine is down. The penalty for carrying marijuana has been reduced. The government has been cutting money to rehab centers knowing that relapse will drive addicts to crime to get money. Of course, the government is not cutting off money for the fun of it, they just don't have the money to keep these centers fully functional.
Still, is it me, or is there something extremely...well, wrong with this picture?
Links:
Decriminalizing Marijuana
Governor Chris Gregoire on budget cuts, including rehab funds
Falling Cocaine Prices - Yahoo News
More About cocaine - BBC
Still, is it me, or is there something extremely...well, wrong with this picture?
Links:
Decriminalizing Marijuana
Governor Chris Gregoire on budget cuts, including rehab funds
Falling Cocaine Prices - Yahoo News
More About cocaine - BBC
No GMO? How Do You Know?
First, I will try to explain the difference between genetically modified and genetically engineered.
Farmers have been genetically modifying foods for centuries to enhance/eliminate certain features. Without genetic modification, we wouldn't have nectarines, apricots, grapefruit, seedless grapes, the incredible varieties of apples, corn, oranges...this list is very long.
As simple as possible, the way genetic modification works, most of the time, is to take a branch of one fruit and stick it in the tree of another. Why they did it? To fight certain disease or fungus, to improve/eliminate certain traits. Now take out a big magnifying lens and look at this process inside the seed/cell. A scientist sitting in a lab goes through the DNA of a seed and snips it part way through to introduce part of something else's DNA. It may be a plant or an animal or any old organism that carries the desired trait. That would be genetically engineered.
In this country, there is no FDA requirement to include genetic information on food labels. However, now it is becoming a "fashion" to include the term "no GMO" on the package somewhere. Instead of GMO, the package may also say no GMI, GMF, GEI, GEF, or GEO. It is a selling point for those who are more aware of these terms. Of course, they can sell their products at a higher price by adding this information.
What is so bad about genetically engineered ingredients anyways? In reality, nothing, because there is no research to show that it is good or bad for certain. It is this uncertainty that is worrying people. Genetically engineered foods have been blamed for allergies, cancers, and disorders to name a few. Maybe, it is true, maybe not. I don't know. Genetic engineering has also been responsible for the success of certain fruits and vegetable in unfamiliar climates, which provided food to countries that otherwise would have suffered drastically from lack of food. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? That would be one big debate for another blog.
OK, back to the point for this blog, how could a company know to say for sure that their products contain no genetically modified or genetically engineered ingredients? I can almost guarantee that there is no way for them to tell if their ingredients are genetically modified. How about genetically engineered? The problem is that cross pollination takes its course, this is nature, and there is hardly any way to control it.
So, companies out there that are so proud of their non-genetically engineered/modified ingredients, how do you know?
I have sent emails to several companies asking them how they knew, and no one ever answered me. I also asked a local farmer, and he too had nothing to say.
Links:
Wikipedia's defenition of Genetically Modified Food
The Future of Food DVD
Farmers have been genetically modifying foods for centuries to enhance/eliminate certain features. Without genetic modification, we wouldn't have nectarines, apricots, grapefruit, seedless grapes, the incredible varieties of apples, corn, oranges...this list is very long.
As simple as possible, the way genetic modification works, most of the time, is to take a branch of one fruit and stick it in the tree of another. Why they did it? To fight certain disease or fungus, to improve/eliminate certain traits. Now take out a big magnifying lens and look at this process inside the seed/cell. A scientist sitting in a lab goes through the DNA of a seed and snips it part way through to introduce part of something else's DNA. It may be a plant or an animal or any old organism that carries the desired trait. That would be genetically engineered.
In this country, there is no FDA requirement to include genetic information on food labels. However, now it is becoming a "fashion" to include the term "no GMO" on the package somewhere. Instead of GMO, the package may also say no GMI, GMF, GEI, GEF, or GEO. It is a selling point for those who are more aware of these terms. Of course, they can sell their products at a higher price by adding this information.
What is so bad about genetically engineered ingredients anyways? In reality, nothing, because there is no research to show that it is good or bad for certain. It is this uncertainty that is worrying people. Genetically engineered foods have been blamed for allergies, cancers, and disorders to name a few. Maybe, it is true, maybe not. I don't know. Genetic engineering has also been responsible for the success of certain fruits and vegetable in unfamiliar climates, which provided food to countries that otherwise would have suffered drastically from lack of food. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? That would be one big debate for another blog.
OK, back to the point for this blog, how could a company know to say for sure that their products contain no genetically modified or genetically engineered ingredients? I can almost guarantee that there is no way for them to tell if their ingredients are genetically modified. How about genetically engineered? The problem is that cross pollination takes its course, this is nature, and there is hardly any way to control it.
So, companies out there that are so proud of their non-genetically engineered/modified ingredients, how do you know?
I have sent emails to several companies asking them how they knew, and no one ever answered me. I also asked a local farmer, and he too had nothing to say.
Links:
Wikipedia's defenition of Genetically Modified Food
The Future of Food DVD
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
The Time Capsule
Those of us who left family, friends, values, cultures, and countries behind in pursuit of better opportunities may relate to this one.
Speaking for myself, I left with my own set of values and traditions, with an image in my mind of loved ones and of the country that I left, and in my mind arranged them in a perfect little time capsule and called it home. Of course, I only took what I liked from each one of these listed factors, which was already a distortion of reality. Still, it was my perfect little world and I liked it the way it was. Only there were two problems with this scenario.
The first is that my time capsule prevented me from fitting in. Instead of jumping in and embracing new cultures, I kept referring back to my set of values, comparing it with those I am seeing, and thinking that I can not possibly do this or that because I am "different".
The other problem was that it distanced me from my comfort zone. The time capsule that I carried so dearly with me was not an accurate reflection of reality. As a result, whenever I went back home I was disappointed to see that people have changed and values have been lost. Of course, things may have never been the way I saw it, I just chose to see it that way.
Conclusion: Neither am I fitting in where I am living now, nor where I used to live. Just hanging in the middle. I am not alone, am I?
Speaking for myself, I left with my own set of values and traditions, with an image in my mind of loved ones and of the country that I left, and in my mind arranged them in a perfect little time capsule and called it home. Of course, I only took what I liked from each one of these listed factors, which was already a distortion of reality. Still, it was my perfect little world and I liked it the way it was. Only there were two problems with this scenario.
The first is that my time capsule prevented me from fitting in. Instead of jumping in and embracing new cultures, I kept referring back to my set of values, comparing it with those I am seeing, and thinking that I can not possibly do this or that because I am "different".
The other problem was that it distanced me from my comfort zone. The time capsule that I carried so dearly with me was not an accurate reflection of reality. As a result, whenever I went back home I was disappointed to see that people have changed and values have been lost. Of course, things may have never been the way I saw it, I just chose to see it that way.
Conclusion: Neither am I fitting in where I am living now, nor where I used to live. Just hanging in the middle. I am not alone, am I?
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Who is "Good Guys"?
Several years back, someone called the intercom to my place and asked for access claiming that he was a police officer trying to catch someone who jumped onto our building's roof. I buzzed him in, but couldn't stop thinking "what if he was not a police officer?" How do you know if a police officer is for real? I made it a point to ask this question to a couple of police officers. According to one, you ask them for their business card! OK, not very convincing to me, but if they say so then there must be something to it that I am not seeing. Or not?
Someone stood there at the freeway exit with a sign that read something along the lines of "all I want is a cheeseburger" or something like that. Of course, I was happy to buy him a cheeseburger and drop it off. Of course I talked about him in the next social gathering. Apparently he has been sitting out there with the same sign for months, maybe even longer...and continued to. How do you know if a beggar on the street is really in need of money or that sandwich?
I tried to work with an orphanage to bring stories to young children (the equivalent of Golden Books in the States). The plan was to have these children read them, record them on disc, and give them as a gift to blind children, and so on until a network was built among children growing up in difficult circumstances. after a big wave of enthusiasm that led to buying the whole series, the lady in charge said "oh, but we have to read them first before giving them to the children, just in case they contain material that they shouldn't be exposed to". Of course, the children never saw these books. Plan down the drain.
At some point, I also tried sponsoring a child in a third world country. I was very excited about the idea. It turns out that there are no kids, and that this organization is raising money to supply weapons to extremists. How terrible did this make me feel?
Now, I am thinking of joining the Team In Training, which is a group that would basically train you for a marathon or triathlon or bike race...etc, in exchange for raising money for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. The majority of me wants to believe that if I go ahead with this I would actually be benefiting someone. But ALL of me is almost certain that that's not the case, based on my experiences above. Yet, if it benefits someone, then it is worth it.
But how do you know if your efforts to help people are really helping those people? I don't. I suppose that it really has to do with my intention. My intention is always to help and this is where it should stop. My experience has taught me to not look back for results. It is almost always disappointing.
Someone stood there at the freeway exit with a sign that read something along the lines of "all I want is a cheeseburger" or something like that. Of course, I was happy to buy him a cheeseburger and drop it off. Of course I talked about him in the next social gathering. Apparently he has been sitting out there with the same sign for months, maybe even longer...and continued to. How do you know if a beggar on the street is really in need of money or that sandwich?
I tried to work with an orphanage to bring stories to young children (the equivalent of Golden Books in the States). The plan was to have these children read them, record them on disc, and give them as a gift to blind children, and so on until a network was built among children growing up in difficult circumstances. after a big wave of enthusiasm that led to buying the whole series, the lady in charge said "oh, but we have to read them first before giving them to the children, just in case they contain material that they shouldn't be exposed to". Of course, the children never saw these books. Plan down the drain.
At some point, I also tried sponsoring a child in a third world country. I was very excited about the idea. It turns out that there are no kids, and that this organization is raising money to supply weapons to extremists. How terrible did this make me feel?
Now, I am thinking of joining the Team In Training, which is a group that would basically train you for a marathon or triathlon or bike race...etc, in exchange for raising money for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. The majority of me wants to believe that if I go ahead with this I would actually be benefiting someone. But ALL of me is almost certain that that's not the case, based on my experiences above. Yet, if it benefits someone, then it is worth it.
But how do you know if your efforts to help people are really helping those people? I don't. I suppose that it really has to do with my intention. My intention is always to help and this is where it should stop. My experience has taught me to not look back for results. It is almost always disappointing.
Saturday, February 14, 2009
Booom!
There are still some people who are working out there, thankfully. Some of whom are trying to change jobs. Risky, but fair if they are so miserable. But what is the story with them trying to make sure that things "blow up" once they leave?
I have recently been talking with several people who are in this situation, and they are all trying to do the same thing, aka making sure that the work is not transferable and/or projects fail once they leave.
Why, you ask? To ensure that those managers who casued them so much misery get to "pay" for it by picking up the mess.
Even if they are not leaving, they are terrified of taking time off because it is a risky situation. If they leave and no one tries to contact them, then they feel useless and at a risk of loosing their job. Then again if they are constantly contacted by their teams, then they can't stop complaining about not being able to enjoy their vacation.
Why is it that things have to reach this level of cheapness especially among well educated people? Why is it that leaving a perfectly functional project/position doesn't speak any more for the qualities of the position holder?
I have recently been talking with several people who are in this situation, and they are all trying to do the same thing, aka making sure that the work is not transferable and/or projects fail once they leave.
Why, you ask? To ensure that those managers who casued them so much misery get to "pay" for it by picking up the mess.
Even if they are not leaving, they are terrified of taking time off because it is a risky situation. If they leave and no one tries to contact them, then they feel useless and at a risk of loosing their job. Then again if they are constantly contacted by their teams, then they can't stop complaining about not being able to enjoy their vacation.
Why is it that things have to reach this level of cheapness especially among well educated people? Why is it that leaving a perfectly functional project/position doesn't speak any more for the qualities of the position holder?
Thursday, February 12, 2009
The Streets are Close to Haunted
The streets and highways are close to haunted. Much as it is fun to zip around town, knowing that the emptiness is coming from people staying at home because they lost their jobs is a terrible feeling. I look forward to the days when the freeways will be bumper-to-bumper again because everyone is rushing to get to work on time.
Monday, February 9, 2009
America, is the socialistic system running in your blood?
This morning, I was listening to NPR. Someone is trying to pass a law that would get drivers in more trouble if they injure pedestrians or bikers. As I drove around, I couldn't help but notice just how obedient drivers are on the street. Everyone is following the driving rules by the book.
The question is why? The answer is fear. Maybe you don't want your car damaged, worried about insurance costs, scared that those around you maybe carrying a gun or other weapon. Regardless the reason, people in the States are not expressing the feelings freely on the streets (or at work for that matter) because of fear. How Socialistic is this as a concept?
Now let's take a look at the control group: China, Russia, Italy...etc. These countries have been run by communism and socialism for the longest time. How are they driving? Like maniacs. As capitalistic in concept as they can get. The road is run by the "fittest".
Does this mean that in countries that follow a pronounced regime, the people seam to follow the other extreme in various channels of their daily life?
The question is why? The answer is fear. Maybe you don't want your car damaged, worried about insurance costs, scared that those around you maybe carrying a gun or other weapon. Regardless the reason, people in the States are not expressing the feelings freely on the streets (or at work for that matter) because of fear. How Socialistic is this as a concept?
Now let's take a look at the control group: China, Russia, Italy...etc. These countries have been run by communism and socialism for the longest time. How are they driving? Like maniacs. As capitalistic in concept as they can get. The road is run by the "fittest".
Does this mean that in countries that follow a pronounced regime, the people seam to follow the other extreme in various channels of their daily life?
Friday, February 6, 2009
America, Are We Still Generous?
Are we applying for government help because we can or because we really need it?
It is something to apply for unemployment benefits, food stamps, government supported healthcare and other services because you just lost your job and that's what people do when they loose their job. It is a completely different story when you apply for these benefits because you lost your job, tried everything that you could, sold everything that you could, have no support whatsoever, and really need the help.
These are two philosophies and I understand why they both make sense, but at times as difficult as they are these days, are we thinking? Are we being fair?
It is something to apply for unemployment benefits, food stamps, government supported healthcare and other services because you just lost your job and that's what people do when they loose their job. It is a completely different story when you apply for these benefits because you lost your job, tried everything that you could, sold everything that you could, have no support whatsoever, and really need the help.
These are two philosophies and I understand why they both make sense, but at times as difficult as they are these days, are we thinking? Are we being fair?
Thursday, February 5, 2009
BMW is destroying our economy?
So, today, I am driving by and there is a group of people standing in front of a BMW dealership or repair shop or something with a banner that reads something the lines that BMW is hurting our economy. This group of people have been standing there with their banner for almost a week now.
Now, I agree that to a certain extent, BMW is not exactly helping our economy so much, but calling on them as hurting our economy is a little bit of a stretch, don't you think? If there was not a single BMW car/dealership/repair shop out there, how many more locally made cars would be sold? On the other hand, how many local jobs would we loose if we didn't have the importers of cars/parts, the technicians working at repair shops, the sales people/managers/technicians/truck drivers who work and service dealerships.
Aren't there bigger fish our there to attack with banners?
Now, I agree that to a certain extent, BMW is not exactly helping our economy so much, but calling on them as hurting our economy is a little bit of a stretch, don't you think? If there was not a single BMW car/dealership/repair shop out there, how many more locally made cars would be sold? On the other hand, how many local jobs would we loose if we didn't have the importers of cars/parts, the technicians working at repair shops, the sales people/managers/technicians/truck drivers who work and service dealerships.
Aren't there bigger fish our there to attack with banners?
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
The Future is in the Hands of Children
Have you seen children lately? They are bombarded with so much responsibility. I feel sorry for children who don't even know what childhood is about. Or maybe it is I who doesn't know. I had plenty of time to play, observe, explore, and take my time growing up when I was a child. Why can't my children have that sort of experience?
It is now the responsibility of children to:
- stay away from sex offenders and drug dealers (Why would a 12 year old be a drug addict?)
- grow up without:
parents because their parents are too busy working
schools because their schools are shutting down
playgrounds or music in their lives because we don't have money to give them these "luxuries"
- take charge of the mess that we are leaving behind whether it is pollution or an aging population
Remind me again, why exactly do we keep having children?
It is now the responsibility of children to:
- stay away from sex offenders and drug dealers (Why would a 12 year old be a drug addict?)
- grow up without:
parents because their parents are too busy working
schools because their schools are shutting down
playgrounds or music in their lives because we don't have money to give them these "luxuries"
- take charge of the mess that we are leaving behind whether it is pollution or an aging population
Remind me again, why exactly do we keep having children?
Why Do I Feel Guilty About Finding A Job?
Ok, so I am one of the lucky ones who don't need to work for money, yet. But does this mean that I can't look for a job? I am feeling guilty knowing that at any given place in this country, I am surrounded by thousands who have lost their primary source of income and are in need of a job. Regardless what job I try to look for, I will be taking away an opportunity from someone who really needs it.
My brother was telling me that each person has their own luck. At any point in time, finding a job will be taking someone else's opportunity to find one. If I am qualified for a job, I may be of more help than I think taking it, and that if I really want to, I can donate part of my income.
I still don't know whether or not I should be looking for a job.
My brother was telling me that each person has their own luck. At any point in time, finding a job will be taking someone else's opportunity to find one. If I am qualified for a job, I may be of more help than I think taking it, and that if I really want to, I can donate part of my income.
I still don't know whether or not I should be looking for a job.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
